Tuesday 24 April 2012

Francis and Dominic

Slocum’s explanation of the foundation of the Franciscan Order
Kay Slocum follows the life of Francis Belardorne of Assisi. He was a young man who involved himself in the conflicts between Assisi and neighbouring towns in which he was taken captive and placed in prison where he became violently ill. In seeking out religious consolation Francis heard a voice from the altar at the Church of St. Damian saying, “Francis, go build my church.” After this he began, using the materials from his father’s shop, to repair his church. His father, enraged, imprisoned Francis however Francis managed to escape and sought refuge with a local bishop. Shortly after Francis dramatically stripped himself of clothing and proclaimed his allegiance to God and renounced his father. Such was the beginning of his life as a holy man.

Francis proceeded to repair churches, however, did not understand fully what his role was in the service of God. This was until a priest’s sermon allowed Francis to realise that he should live and preach the apostolic life, a life in which one was completely unburdened by the possession of personal property or money. Francis, having attracted some followers, drew up a rule detailing this lifestyle. In contrast to the cloistered monks of the Cistercian Order Francis advocated a life residing amongst the people surviving on work and alms. This was inspirational to those, particularly the literate, who sought to imitate the life of Jesus according to the gospels due to dissatisfaction with the “moral laxity” of the clergy and tedium of monastic spirituality. Moreover Francis’ appreciation for the beauty of the natural world allowed him to create an emotional connection with the populous including heretics. As Slocum illustrates, however, Francis avoided serious accusations of heresy himself due to his respect for the priesthood and sacraments. Though initially reluctant, this allowed Pope Innocent to approve the Franciscan Rule in 1210.

The Franciscan Order, now official, began to expand and engage in missionary activity throughout Europe. Though the order was conceived initially without governance the increased size required Francis to write the second rule which reinforced the commitment to authority and established an administrational hierarchy. From there on the Franciscan Order had its own mature identity which began to influence further religious orders of holy poverty such as the “Poor Clares.”

Also Slocum’s explanation of the foundation of the Dominican Order 
The Dominican order was different to that of the Franciscans, although in some ways the two mirrored each other closely.  The Dominicans “emphasized learning and education” (p.361) and it “closely resembled the traditional monastic establishments” (p.361).  It was started as an attempt to control Cathar heresy. Dominic de Guzmán, a Spanish priest, and his bishop Diego of Osma, began “itinerant preaching” (p. 361) and eventually became known as the ‘order of preachers’.

Like the Franciscans, the Dominicans adopted the apostolic life of poverty, which suggests that this way of life was becoming more of an ideal sought throughout Europe as it gained wealth.

The Dominicans were unable to create a new rule for themselves, however the Pope Honorius III gave papal confirmation for the order to become a branch of the Rule of St Augustine, as it was very close to the desires of the Dominicans. Unlike St Francis, Dominic readily accepted the need for administration and organisation and created a “representative form of government of the Order of Preachers” (p.365) which was unique to it.

In Celano’s account of Francis’ life, with what values does he imbue the figure of Francis?
Tomas of Celano, in his account of Francis’ life, portrays him as a pious and devoted man who despises the burdens of material possession in favour of spiritual wisdom, appreciation of God’s creation and the apostolic life. Francis is bold yet gentle which serves to create an enigmatic and almost Christ-like persona. These qualities are illustrated as Francis, on receiving payment for the sale of his clothes and horse, offers it almost immediately to a church in disrepair both in order to rebuild the church and free him of the monetary burden. On the priests refusal of the donation Francis throws the money out of the window “treating it as if it were dust.” He does this, according to Celano, because “he wanted to possess wisdom, which is better than gold, and prudence, which is more precious than silver.” This contempt for worldly possessions is illustrated further when Francis, on hearing the priest’s explanation of the gospel, discards all that he owns in favour of a crude tunic. Even in poverty Francis reinforces his humility through mortification of the flesh and his devotion to the service to god as he strips himself of his clothes and hands them to his father, standing before him completely naked unashamed. This is further established in his capture by the Saracens in which he remains composed in the face of death and torture. His dramatic actions are, however, always laced with a selflessness and respect for all of God’s creation. His generosity is matched with his affection for nature. Celano’s Francis possessed a powerful emanating grace which earned him much exultation as a preacher. It in is this romantic balance between confidence and compassion that Celano achieves the portrayal of Francis as almost a Christ like figure.

From Celano’s stories how do you understand Francis’ relationship with the natural world?
Francis, in Celano’s stories, is profoundly and connected to the natural world. He believes it crucial that all of creation should know the word of God and became famous not only for his preaching to the animals but the command he seemed to have of them.
“…He exorted all birds, all animals, all reptiles, and even nonexistant creatures to praise and love the creator for every day, when the name of the saviour was announced, he himself saw their obedience”
Celano tells us about Francis’ travels as he returns fish to the water, preaches to the birds and commands wildlife. Perhaps most notable, however, is the way in which Celano shows Francis’ holiness and compassion seems to miraculously emanate as if he were a Christ-like conduit of the grace of God. This can be seen in the story of the woman made able to give birth safely by touching the reigns of a horse ridden by Francis. His way with the animals, was so great, that the animals themselves became holy.

Le Goff places Francis life in the context of increased urbanisation. What argument does Le Goff make about the impact of urban life upon Francis’ religious life?
In the years preceding Francis’ birth, the population of Europe increased dramatically, and “people had to be fed, materially and spiritually” (p.1).  People began to live closer together and so more urban societies began to form as built-up areas formed around castles and churches. Le Goff states that “holiness related more directly to towns” (p.2), in order to maintain influence over the population, the Church had to embrace towns and adapt to them.

The importance of possessions and property grew, creating a more materialistic society. In response to that “the Church was the first to change” (p.3). The Gregorian reforms were introduced which created strong distinctions between the Church and laity, it also “involved an aspiration … to achieve the true apostolic life” (p.4) New Orders appeared which preached a return to poverty, these Orders were successful because they were able to connect with the people in urban life who were becoming “increasingly active in religious life” (p.5).

Le Goff suggests that the rise of urbanisation created a society where religion was more accessible to the people but the world was becoming “one of exclusion” (p.11), Francis, in contrast, proclaimed the “divine presence in all creatures” (p.11). Thus it could be argued that Francis saw the world as becoming increasingly focused on individuals and their property and problems. As a result he tried to create a life of equality amongst all, where the divine was the centre of all life. Throughout his life, St Francis was often compared to Jesus, many believing that he was a new incarnation of the Son of God. 

--Bobbie & Jeremy

Monday 23 April 2012

Clarification

Clarification I:
There are no classes on campus for ATS1316 in week 8. Your posts on the Crusades and Crusade Historians post, below, constitute your 'virtual tutorial' for this week.

Clarification II:
Blogs by presenters in week 9 will go live on Wednesday. Everyone needs to read and comment on these, even if they are not presenting.

Clarification III:
For presenters in weeks 9-11:

Topic St Francis (wk 9) Crusades (wk 10) Black Death (wk 11)
Blog Post
to Kathleen
5pm Tue. 24th April 5pm Tue. 1st May 5pm Tue. 8th May
Presentation Mon. 30th April Mon. 7th May Mon. 14th May
Essay Due Fri. 11 May Fri. 18 May Fri. 25 May

Friday 20 April 2012

Important Announcement

Unfortunately the audio of the week 7 lectures have not been recorded. The slides are available, however, on both MULO and Blackboard. I am very sorry for the inconvenience, but sometimes technology does fail. I know that some of you have clashes and need to rely on the recordings. I would urge, however, those of you who can attend the lectures to do so, because that is the only absolutely guaranteed way that you have of hearing the material
Cheers, Clare

Wednesday 18 April 2012

Crusades and Crusade Historians

  [Edit: spelling of Tyerman corrected. Thanks JJ!]
Truce between Christians and Saracens.
Matthew Paris, Chronica Maiora, Parker MS 16II, f.139v.
In lectures during week 7 Clare raised the issue of thinking about where historians are coming from when they write. I'd like us to try and incorporate this into our discussions in this week's virtual tutorial. I've provided some links that give you other people's perspectives on Christopher Tyerman, author of the chapter on the Meaning of the Crusades, and his work. There are reviews of one of his recent books by Jonathan Philips - another well-known historian of the Crusades - and Dame Janet (a.k.a. 'Jinty') Nelson, a prominent early medievalist. I've also given you a link to an interview with Dr Tyerman himself. If you can, I recommend reading through these after you've looked at Tyerman's chapter. Address the questions in the reading pack, but also consider whether Tyerman's view seems to represent a consensus; and how his views differ from or relate to those of others who have written and thought about the Crusades.

In this interview, Tyerman talks about how it is misleading and ahistorical to draw direct connections between modern wars in the Middle East and the medieval crusading movement. I agree with him on this point, and it brings me to a general matter I forgot to mention in class, which is: while modern parallels and experiences can be useful tools for helping us think about the past, we should never confuse them with historical argument itself, which always has to be based in the evidence and context of the period. I'm sure you knew this - but especially following our discussions about ANZAC cove and Canterbury it seemed a good time to remind ourselves of this point...


Urban II preaching the crusade

But back to the Crusades! The Institute for Historical Research in London runs a monthly seminar about the Crusades, so clearly there's no shortage of opinion and debate on the topic.

The same was true at the time of the very first crusade. As Megan told us a couple of weeks back, pope Urban's sermon was recorded in different versions by a range of observers. Does applying similar principles of interpretation to these reports help you think about how and why they differ? Where were these medieval writers coming from, do you think? Why were they writing? Who was in their assumed audience?
Post your thoughts and responses to these readings below by Monday evening. Then we'll be moving on to St Francis and Co.!

Wednesday 11 April 2012

Women's Roles

The Role of the Bible
This week’s readings look into the word or medieval women and how the views and roles of women during medieval times were shaped by the bible.
What are some of the difference between the expectations of today’s women and the medieval women?
  • What were the expectations of medieval women?
Mary
From the Bible Genesis 1:24-2:9; 2:15-3:20, we see how Christianity viewed women and coming into existence after men, women were created to be a partner for men. “She shall be called women because she was taken out of man.” (p.157) From this and other bible readings we can see a picture forming where men are seen as superior to women. “Christianity Preached equality but regarded women as morally and physically weaker than men.” (p.156) It is interesting to see how overtime these views have been outdate, but to what extent? “Mary in Christian Theology, was both a virgin and mother. Her sinlessness made her an unattainable ideal but her humanity made her an attractive advocate for prayer.” (p.187).
  • How much really has changed about this being the ideal women?
Women of the High Middle Ages, c. 1100-1400
What we know of women during that period is largely from male writers. As well, stories that we know of women tend to be about what men admired or abhorred. Peter Lombard a theologian wrote of much affection of women; that women were brought from the rib of man to be a companion and friend of man.
On the other hand, it is interesting to see that women were seen as both the “bent rib of man”, an unequal due to gender. In the narrative of Adam and Eve, Eve was seen as the downfall of man, a natural temptation that brings about the sins to man. However, in some writings women were seen as valued higher than man, a bearer of life.
Mary Magdalene interestingly was a repentant sinner. Her transformation to a devoted Christian; made Mary of Magdalene somewhat more revered than the pure and sinless Virgin Mary. Therefore in a religion where one was in sin from the moment they were born; Mary of Magdalene was seen as “everywoman”, someone whose actions were revered by medieval women, which aimed to influence and inspire them from their sinful ways.
Status of women played an important part in medieval society. A woman was revered on three accounts: a virgin; married woman; or one that was married to God and thus the Church. Society gave women who did not get married the only other alternative of joining the nunnery.
  • To what extent did religious writing of Adam and Eve, the story of Mary of Magdalene or theologian writing influence Christianity’s control of medieval women in society?
Women’s Voices
Women participated in history however they did not write it. Early medieval women are only present in the backgrounds of stories about gallant men. Women did not exist much else in medieval history from what we know, until they were given a voice which was much later towards the 13th -14th century. This voice however was minuscule and relied only upon a few ‘well off’ women who had been granted (by their male elders) the right to an education.
Geoffrey Chaucer, Canterbury tales, 14th century:
“If wommen hadde written stories
As clerks han withinne hire oratories,
They wolde han writen of men moore wikkednesse
Than al the mark of Adam may redresse.”
  • Do you think that if women were given more right to have their say then history would be written differently?
However, some women were given a voice even if it were not their own. It appears that women who are written about were more ‘bad’ than ‘good’ (addressing what was socially acceptable). No one was intrigued by mundane women who played their lesser role in society. Joan of Arc, leading the French army to numerous victories; Heloise, certain behaviours out of wedlock; Eleanor of Aquitaine, joining the second crusade and annulling her marriage. All these women stood outside the social norms in one way or another and therefore have gained an infamous status in history. 
Eleanor of Aquitaine; Joan of Arc; Heloise and Abelard

Friday 6 April 2012

Easter Week

Hi everyone,
I hope you're having a nice break - but not too much of a break, because essays are looming! Use time off lectures and tutorials to get ahead on your research if you can. In the meanwhile, here's some medieval Easter music to pass the time...

Resurrexi, Music for Easter Sunday, British Library, Crowland Gradual, c.1240.
The image shows a manuscript called a Gradual, which is a collection of musical items for the Mass. There are two musical pieces on the page. The decorated capital R is the beginning of the introit for Easter Sunday. An introit, as you might guess from the name, is sung at the beginning of the Mass. This one comes from Psalm 138, and reads, in Latin:

Resurrexi, et adhuc tecum sum, alleluia. Posuisti super me manum tuam, alleluia. Mirabilis facta est scientia tua, alleluia. Domine probasti me et cognivisti me. 
[I rose up and am still with thee, alleluia. Thou hast laid thy hand upon me, alleluia. Thy knowledge is become wonderful to me, alleluia. Lord, thou hast proved me, and known me]
Listen to a performance of a medieval setting of this psalm by Schola Cantorum here

Then, with the large black "h", begins another psalm, no. 118:
Haec dies quam fecit Dominus: exultemus et laetemur in ea
[This is the day that the Lord made: let us be glad and rejoice in it.]
Listen to a performance of a later (16th century) setting of this psalm by The King's Singers here

Can you make out any of the words, now that you know what it should say?

See you on Monday week,
Kathleen


Tuesday 3 April 2012

The Passion

The Passion, for those who don't know, is a term for Jesus' crucifixion on Good Friday. In medieval times one of the symbols of this was the pelican. A widespread story, often illustrated in Bestiaries, related how the pelican fed her starving young with her own blood; this was taken as a metaphor of Christ's sacrifice. The Pelican in her Piety, as this story was called, became a common artistic motif in medieval religious architecture, and in encyclopaedic books. The image here shows the Pelican in her Piety represented in a misericord at St Mary's Abbey, Beverley, in Yorkshire, a famous example of 14th century English Gothic style. She is pecking her own breast to release the blood and feed the chicks. (They weren't shy of graphic images in those days!)

Pelican in her Piety, St Mary's, Beverley. By awmc1 @ flickr
A misericord is a little folding seat in the quire (i.e. choir) area of churches that the monks or canons could lean on during long services. It comes from the Latin for mercy, because allowing a tired singer to sit down was like taking mercy on him! In the medieval period the underneath of misericords, like the one shown here, came to be decorated in marvellous carvings, since this was the part of the seat most often visible to those moving about the church between services. Some had religious images, and others had very surprisingly secular ones, like illustrations from tales of knightly deeds and the rescue of fair maidens, or images of monsters.